Tis much more exciting to read the in-world version!! I have very little knowledge of the "big picture" science and numbers mumbo-jumbo as far as The World is concerned, and frankly my eyes glaze over when I read posts here agonising over this or that minutia of geography and climate. I know a lot of folks are into that kind of detail, but I find it snoresomely tedious. So long as the world is consistent within itself and is well described, all is well! You've shown me a world very different from mine, but is every bit as internally consistent and is certainly very well described!Micamo wrote:I do, but there are two reasons why I'm posting things from an in-world perspective instead.gestaltist wrote:Got it.
I understand you prefer to recount things from an in-world perspective so I am not going to ask about the meta-level mechanics, but I would like to ask if you even have them. Have you developed this world from an inherently in-world view, or do you have the „big picture“ (the science, the numbers...) as well?
I wish -- nay, I DEMAND -- that you write all this up into a longer saga! I'll buy copy no. 1 right off the press! There's just something about the way you're telling the story of this world that I find compelling. Tis like kettle cooked chips -- can't eat just one, and once you start, you can't stop til the bag is empty and you've licked all the salty goodness off the inside! And then you just end up waiting for the next installment to come along...