Is Sembase fake?

A forum for discussing linguistics or just languages in general.
User avatar
Ahzoh
mongolian
mongolian
Posts: 4191
Joined: 20 Oct 2013 02:57
Location: Canada

Re: Is Sembase fake?

Post by Ahzoh »

It's k1234567890y or k-1to0-y
Image Śād Warḫallun (Vrkhazhian) [ WIKI | CWS ]
User avatar
Isfendil
greek
greek
Posts: 668
Joined: 19 Feb 2016 03:47

Re: Is Sembase fake?

Post by Isfendil »

Ahzoh wrote:It's k1234567890y or k-1to0-y
This is what I get for not analyzing a cloud of information. Thank you, Ahzoh.
User avatar
Vlürch
greek
greek
Posts: 452
Joined: 09 Mar 2016 21:19
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Is Sembase fake?

Post by Vlürch »

Isfendil wrote:Proto semitic has several ejectives
Ohhhhh, right... I thought Proto-Afroasiatic had ejectives but that they were gone by the time it had split. [>_<]
User avatar
Isfendil
greek
greek
Posts: 668
Joined: 19 Feb 2016 03:47

Re: Is Sembase fake?

Post by Isfendil »

Vlürch wrote:
Isfendil wrote:Proto semitic has several ejectives
Ohhhhh, right... I thought Proto-Afroasiatic had ejectives but that they were gone by the time it had split. [>_<]
No it's okay! People still argue that they're already pharyngealized, it's just that currently the most widely accepted view is that they were still ejectives, because the Abyssinian languages still have them.
Post Reply