Guess the Word in Germanic Conlangs

[zyma]

Is it a weak verb?

[spanick]

Is it a weak verb?

Yes.

[zyma]

Class 2?

[spanick]

Class 2?

Nope.

[zyma]

Class 1?

[spanick]

Class 1?

Yes.

[zyma]

Is it from Proto-Germanic *tukkijaną?

[spanick]

Is it from Proto-Germanic *tukkijaną?

No it’s not. I’m afraid it’s not quite as transparent as that ;) but you’re on the right track.

[zyma]

Is it descended from a word that's attested in Biblical Gothic?

[spanick]

Is it descended from a word that's attested in Biblical Gothic?

Yes it is.

[zyma]

Is the form on the right a past participle, or is my knowledge of German clouding my judgement?

[spanick]

Is the form on the right a past participle, or is my knowledge of German clouding my judgement?

In this case, your knowledge of German is clouding your judgment haha. The prefix is related to the German but has a different use in Gotski.

[zyma]

Oh, is the right variant a perfect/perfective form?

[spanick]

Oh, is the right variant a perfect/perfective form?

Yes! It’s the perfective.

[zyma]

Does <z> represent /z/? Was the initial consonant <𐍄> in Biblical Gothic?

[spanick]

Does <z> represent /z/? Was the initial consonant <𐍄> in Biblical Gothic?

Yes and yes.

[zyma]

Was the first vowel originally rounded in Biblical Gothic?

[spanick]

Was the first vowel originally rounded in Biblical Gothic?

Yes, it was.

[zyma]

Is it from 𐍄𐌿𐌻𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽/tulgjan?

[spanick]

Is it from 𐍄𐌿𐌻𐌲𐌾𐌰𐌽/tulgjan?

No. Sorry, I misread your question before and thought that the <T> was x-sampa/T/. The initial is the interdental fricative. Since I messed up I’ll also give you a couple extra clues...you have the right stem vowel now and you were closer with the stem ending in <k> than <g>.