English and typology

A forum for discussing linguistics or just languages in general.
HoskhMatriarch
roman
roman
Posts: 1500
Joined: 16 May 2015 18:48

Re: English and typology

Post by HoskhMatriarch »

Oh, I was just thinking about sleep a sleep, fight a fight, die a death, etc. where you take intransitive verbs and they can be transitive if the object is a nominalization of the verb. I don't think those are common, although you can do the same thing in German.
No darkness can harm you if you are guided by your own inner light
Prinsessa
runic
runic
Posts: 2647
Joined: 07 Nov 2011 14:42

Re: English and typology

Post by Prinsessa »

I think it sounds silly so I've made the conscious decision to have such constructions be "bad form" in my conlang, perhaps seen as silly "baby talk".
HoskhMatriarch
roman
roman
Posts: 1500
Joined: 16 May 2015 18:48

Re: English and typology

Post by HoskhMatriarch »

Prinsessa wrote:I think it sounds silly so I've made the conscious decision to have such constructions be "bad form" in my conlang, perhaps seen as silly "baby talk".
Why not just make it not be possible then? I think in a lot of languages it's just not grammatical, like how "motion estimation search range settings" is not a grammatical way of stringing words together in French.
No darkness can harm you if you are guided by your own inner light
Post Reply