English and typology
-
- roman
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: 16 May 2015 18:48
Re: English and typology
Oh, I was just thinking about sleep a sleep, fight a fight, die a death, etc. where you take intransitive verbs and they can be transitive if the object is a nominalization of the verb. I don't think those are common, although you can do the same thing in German.
No darkness can harm you if you are guided by your own inner light
Re: English and typology
I think it sounds silly so I've made the conscious decision to have such constructions be "bad form" in my conlang, perhaps seen as silly "baby talk".
-
- roman
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: 16 May 2015 18:48
Re: English and typology
Why not just make it not be possible then? I think in a lot of languages it's just not grammatical, like how "motion estimation search range settings" is not a grammatical way of stringing words together in French.Prinsessa wrote:I think it sounds silly so I've made the conscious decision to have such constructions be "bad form" in my conlang, perhaps seen as silly "baby talk".
No darkness can harm you if you are guided by your own inner light