I just mean tripartite because it appears to indicate "three parts." I am certain there is more to its definition, but I like the word.eldin raigmore wrote: ↑09 Apr 2024 17:16Look here https://books.google.com/books/about/N ... -pgAFcE0C .
Something similar to your “tripartite” plural system might be attested by one or more of the languages Corbett discusses.
I’m not certain what you mean by “tripartite plural”. I tried to find where you discussed it, but couldn’t find it quickly enough.
If you mean something similar to what Corbett calls “top-second” number systems, then I’m sure he discusses some natural language(s) that have something similar.
….
Interesting conlang!
Edit: looking up the exact definition, I think I rely on the idea of "sets." The subject is a set, the object is a set, and the both of them are a set.